Menu

Policy Brief: Is Federal Parity Effective?

State parity laws may explain why federal policy aimed at increasing access to alcohol treatment services shows modest effect

Subset of Total Predicted Trends in Alcohol Treatment Admission Rates Before and After the MHPAEA by Pre-Existing Parity Policy, U.S. States n=46

In the US, 16 million people have an alcohol use disorder and heavy drinking is a leading cause of preventable death. However, accessing care for substance use and mental health problems can be more difficult than getting general medical or surgical care.

Although the Federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act was enacted in 2008, a brief from PHI’s Alcohol Research Group shows that only strong parity states and states with coverage and partial parity had higher treatment admission rates. Extending parity laws to more Americans will help ensure people receive the care they need.

Read the policy brief.

Originally published by Alcohol Research Group


Work With Us

You change the world. We do the rest. Explore fiscal sponsorship at PHI.

Bring Your Work to PHI

Support Us

Together, we can accelerate our response to public health’s most critical issues.

Donate

Find Employment

Begin your career at the Public Health Institute.

See Jobs

TTH volunteers, United Against COVID

Close

Achieving Vaccine Equity: Resources & Best Practices to Bring Down Barriers

To stop the spread of COVID-19, we must ensure easy, equitable access to vaccines—starting with communities that are made most vulnerable due to systemic inequities. Find tools, resources and best practices to support vaccine equity in your community.

See resources, tools, videos & more

Continue to PHI.org