Menu

Policy Brief: Is Federal Parity Effective?

State parity laws may explain why federal policy aimed at increasing access to alcohol treatment services shows modest effect

Subset of Total Predicted Trends in Alcohol Treatment Admission Rates Before and After the MHPAEA by Pre-Existing Parity Policy, U.S. States n=46

In the US, 16 million people have an alcohol use disorder and heavy drinking is a leading cause of preventable death. However, accessing care for substance use and mental health problems can be more difficult than getting general medical or surgical care.

Although the Federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act was enacted in 2008, a brief from PHI’s Alcohol Research Group shows that only strong parity states and states with coverage and partial parity had higher treatment admission rates. Extending parity laws to more Americans will help ensure people receive the care they need.

Read the policy brief.

Originally published by Alcohol Research Group


Work With Us

You change the world. We do the rest. Explore fiscal sponsorship at PHI.

Bring Your Work to PHI

Support Us

Together, we can accelerate our response to public health’s most critical issues.

Donate

Find Employment

Begin your career at the Public Health Institute.

See Jobs

closeup image of coronavirus

Close

COVID-19 Resources and Updates

The Public Health Institute is working hard to focus our resources and expertise to address COVID-19 and its impacts on our communities. We are getting masks and PPE directly to frontline workers, bolstering efforts to address inequities, and coming up with solutions to support our most vulnerable communities.

See our work

Continue to PHI.org