Menu

In the News

StreetsBlog Cites California Healthy Places Index as Measurement Tool for Developing Freeways

If passed, A.B. 1778, a bill championed by Assemblymember Cristina Garcia to protect sensitive communities from the health and environmental impacts of newly developed freeways, would prohibit Caltrans from using state resources on projects or permit any project that does not meet criteria measured by PHI’s Public Health Alliance of Southern California Healthy Places Index.

Today was “Suspense File Day,” the deadline by which bills that have been set aside by the Senate and Assembly Appropriations Committees must be either passed to the floor or passed over.

One of the hundreds of bills that made it out of the Assembly’s committee was A.B. 1778, Assemblymember Cristina Garcia’s bill to protect communities in the paths of the inexorable freeway building machine. The bill would prohibit Caltrans from using state resources on any project, or on permitting any project, that does not meet certain criteria measured by the California Healthy Places Index.

That index is an online resource developed by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California to offer a systematic way of mapping community health factors like well-being and life expectancy. As a condition of using state funds or personnel time on projects, Caltrans would have to first consult the California Healthy Places Index on factors that include low-income housing cost burden and pollution within communities. If a project would be within or next to a census tract that rated high on these factors, state money would not be allowed to be used on these projects.

The bill has strong support from climate, environmental justice, and health organizations, but has also riled up opposition, particularly from labor – among whom are people who have argued that freeways are more important than housing.

“Freeway expansion projects are sold as a means to reduce congestion, however research shows us that they increase congestion by encouraging more driving, thus increasing harmful emission. Data also shows that these projects also tend to displace low-income communities of color who are already housing insecure. It is outrageous and feels criminal to use state resources to choke and displace communities like mine when the data and research clearly show that this practice is just another example of the systemic racism that is normalized in our policies and practices.”

“Departments, agencies, and officials like to use words like equity. Now is the chance to put action behind this word to ensure communities like mine are at the forefront of these decisions, policies, and practices. We can no longer allow state dollars to fund expansion projects that kill of us faster and displace us from our homes in the middle of a housing crisis.”

The bill now goes the floor of the Assembly, where it will need support to pass to the Senate.

Read the full story below.

Originally published by StreetsBlog Cal


More Updates

Work With Us

You change the world. We do the rest. Explore fiscal sponsorship at PHI.

Bring Your Work to PHI

Support Us

Together, we can accelerate our response to public health’s most critical issues.

Donate

Find Employment

Begin your career at the Public Health Institute.

See Jobs

TTH volunteers, United Against COVID

Close

Achieving Vaccine Equity: Resources & Best Practices to Bring Down Barriers

To stop the spread of COVID-19, we must ensure easy, equitable access to vaccines—starting with communities that are made most vulnerable due to systemic inequities. Find tools, resources and best practices to support vaccine equity in your community.

See resources, tools, videos & more

Continue to PHI.org