Soda Tax Debates in Berkeley and San Francisco: An Analysis of Social Media, Campaign Materials and News Coverage
- Berkeley Media Studies Group; John Snow, Inc.
Chronic Disease Prevention
Nutrition & Food Security
Berkeley Media Studies Group
In 2014, voters in the cities of Berkeley and San Francisco, California, were asked to decide whether to place an excise tax on sugary drinks sold within their borders. Berkeley made history when it passed the nation’s first tax on sugary drinks, despite an aggressive anti-tax campaign from the beverage industry. San Francisco’s measure was approved by the majority of voters but failed to reach the two-thirds majority it needed to pass.
Given the prominence of these two policy battles and the likelihood that more will follow, PHI’s Berkeley Media Studies Group looks at the social media, campaign materials and news coverage of the soda tax debates in Berkeley and San Francisco. What stories did tax advocates and opponents tell? How were the soda industry, its products and its spending characterized? Who was quoted in the news coverage, and what did they say? What lessons can the coverage offer advocates and other stakeholders seeking to improve health in their communities by regulating sugary drinks?
- Read the case study of Berkeley vs. Big Soda’s social media campaign and see the infographic.
- Help spread the word with a tweet: New @BMSG research on Bay Area soda taxes looks at #media portrayals + lessons learned http://bit.ly/1nApyDF via @phidotorg
Originally published by Berkeley Media Studies Group
Work With Us
You change the world. We do the rest. Explore fiscal sponsorship at PHI.
Together, we can accelerate our response to public health’s most critical issues.
Begin your career at the Public Health Institute.